The Danger of Conflation

What is Antisemitism?

Since Hamas’s atrocious attack on October 7 and Israel’s near-immediate retaliatory bombings that have killed more than 18,000 Palestinians, Europe has seen a troubling surge in both state and private efforts to restrict criticism of Israel or support of “the Palestinian cause” with the stated goal of protecting against anti-Semitism. But how is anti-Semitism being defined, why so, and with what results?

In announcing their measures, most European states refer to a controversial definition of anti-Semitism endorsed by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in 2016. This definition largely focuses on examples that include criticisms of Israel, leaving it open to manipulation for political aims. More recently, in 2021, a group of scholars from Holocaust, anti-Semitism, and genocide studies published the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism (JDA), offering more specific guidelines for identifying anti-Semitism, particularly with regard to criticism and debate around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Zionism. Notably, the IHRA’s statement since October 7 focused rather on addressing anti-Semitism “regrettably homegrown in all our societies” and the danger of “blaming Jews for Israel’s actions.”

With these definitions in mind, how can we address the very real rise of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in Europe against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas war? How can we avoid entrenched positions that frame the Israel-Hamas war as a war between Jews and Palestinians? This panel discusses the dangers of discursively conflating Jews with the state of Israel and Palestinians (and pro-Palestinian voices) with Hamas and considers how to more productively define, recognize, and protect against anti-Semitism (acts or speech against “Jews as Jews”) and Islamophobia in the current climate.

About the speakers

Jessica Feldman is an Assistant Professor / Enseignante-Chercheuse in Communication, Media, and Culture at the American University of Paris and a fellow at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study (NIAS). She researches the political ramifications and potentials of emerging digital technologies (AI, digital security); specifically their capacity to facilitate or repress solidarity and collective self-governance.

Ayşenur Korkmaz is a research fellow at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study (NIAS) in Amsterdam. She earned her Ph.D. from the University of Amsterdam, at the department of  European Studies. Her current work focuses on the multifaceted aftereffects of the Armenian genocide in Soviet and post-Soviet Armenia. She explores how the genocide survivors and their descendants in Armenia have been reflecting on the violent past, losses, and expulsion from the ancestral homeland.

Jan Willem Duyvendak (moderator) is Distinguished Research Professor of Sociology at the University of Amsterdam and Director of NIAS-KNAW. His main fields of research currently are the transformation of the welfare state, belonging and “feeling at home,” and nativism. His latest books include Thuis. Het drama van een sentimentele samenleving (Amsterdam University Press 2017), Macht der gewoonte. Populisme in de polder (Walburg Pers 2022, with Menno Hurenkamp) and The Return of the Native. Can Liberalism Safeguard Us Against Nativism? (Oxford University Press 2022, with Josip Kešić).

Gerelateerde programma’s
23 03 26
​​De symfonie van onvrede: de opmars van radicaal-rechts in Europa​

De symfonie van onvrede is een persoonlijke en analytische verkenning van de opkomst van radicaal-rechts in Europa. In het boek verbindt Catherine de Vries haar eigen familiegeschiedenis met haar jarenlange academische studie naar politieke onvrede en politieke strategie van radicaal-rechtse partijen. Ze laat zien hoe structurele veranderingen in de samenleving, van het Nederlandse platteland tot Zuid-Italië, hebben bijgedragen aan een gevoel van verlies en woede, en hoe die gevoelens politiek worden gekanaliseerd. 

Datum
Maandag 23 mrt 2026 20:00 uur
Locatie
SPUI25
27 10 25
De politieke bril van de econoom

In verkiezingstijd wemelt het van de economische analyses, voorspellingen en modellen. Het CPB berekent partijprogramma’s door en cijfers worden in debatten vaak opgebracht als objectieve feiten in een zee van politieke beloften. Maar hoe politiek is de bril van de econoom eigenlijk?

Datum
Maandag 27 okt 2025 20:00 uur
Locatie
SPUI25
02 10 25
Oneindigheid – een filosofische gids

Het oneindige is grenzeloos fascinerend. Het lijkt evident dat wij eindige wezens het oneindige nooit zullen begrijpen. Toch duikt het telkens opnieuw op in de filosofie – we kunnen er kennelijk ook niet aan ontkomen. Aan de hand van de vele denkers die zich met het thema hebben beziggehouden, leidt filosoof Victor Gijsbers ons in zijn nieuwe boek Oneindigheid langs de belangrijkste vragen over het oneindige in de wiskunde, de natuur, de werkelijkheid en het menselijk leven. Dichter Lieke Marsman komt voordragen uit eigen werk. 

Datum
Donderdag 2 okt 2025 20:00 uur
Locatie
SPUI25